Related Figures
Figure 3 The decisional process for the LEUKOCYTE...
Figure 1b (b) After update
Figure 8 Schematic representations.(A) Mechanical...
Figure 1 The web interface of SPRING.
Fig. 4 AT II analogue design and cell logic. A ...
Figure 8 Screenshots of epiPATH update tool.
Figure 1 Retrotransposons collectively comprise 7...
Figure 1 Number of protein structures and membran...
Figure 2 System architecture. This pilot system u...
Figure 5 The management component for the genome ...
Figure 2: Flow diagram of the model.Blue boxes indicate spring procedures. First, all membrane agents are updated in asynchronous random order, then, based on spring length adjustments, their positions are updated. Second, each cell agent updates its total protein levels across all its associated membrane agents, inserts new nodes where required and recalculates its surface agent coverage.
Image Text (High Precision): Cell Fig Hookes active agent agents applied calculate coverage delete divide divided filopodia insert levels ligand memAgents nodes positions protein recept receptor remove required springs step surface time update
Other Images from "Tipping the Balance: Robustness of Tip Cell Selection, Migration and Fusion in Angiogenesis":
Figure 10 Graphs comparing in vivo and in silico f...
Figure 4 Simulation showing stalk cells flip fate...
Figure 11 Spring constant sensitivity analysis res...
Figure 9 Graphs comparing junction size range and...
Figure 2 Flow diagram of the model.Blue boxes ind...
Figure 6 In vivo and in silico elongation of cell...
Figure 5 Graphs showing normal patterning is sens...
Figure 3 In vivo and in silico retinal sprouting,...
Figure 1 Overview of the spring-agent model.(A) A...
Figure 8 Frequency of runs which could not stabil...
Figure 7 Graphs comparing selection stabilisation...