Preperitoneal view of gro... - Yale Image Finder

Related Figures

Figure 3 The plug is anchored in the preperitonea...

Fig. 1 Measurements of subcutaneous and preperi...

Figure 2 Morphological features of LYVE-1 positiv...

Fig. 4 Effect of sex on abdominal fat compartme...

Fig. 5 Effect of age on abdominal fat compartme...

Figure 1 (a) CD31-immunoreactive vessels in skin ...

Figure 4 Vessel quantitation after ischemic insul...

Fig. 5 The broad GFAP-positive glial processes ...

Figure 4 SMA staining showing positivity of the l...

Figure 3 LD flap with anastomosis of the vessels.

Fig 1: Preperitoneal view of groin: 1. inferior epigastric vessels 2. position of transversalis incision made to enter the preperitoneal space 3. internal ring 4. testicular vessels 5. inguinal ligament 6. symphysis pubis 7. vas deferens 8. external iliac vessels. Dotted line represents the preperitoneal position of Kugel patch from inside.

Image Text (High Precision):

Other Images from "Immediate and long-term outcomes of Lichtenstein and Kugel patch operations for inguinal hernia repair":

Fig 1 Preperitoneal view of groin: 1. inferior...

[Full Text] [PDF]

Abstract

AimThe aim of this retrospective study is to compare the immediate and long-term postoperative outcomes of Lichtenstein and Kugel repair of inguinal hernia.MethodsFrom 1996 to 2006, 219 consecutive patients underwent inguinal hernia repair - 92 using a standard Lichtenstein repair and 127 with a Kugel patch. Patient characteristics, length of postoperative hospital stay and complication rates were assessed by retrospective review of the notes. Recurrence and chronic groin pain were assessed by postal questionnaire (with a follow up by telephone interview for non-responders). Patients with symptoms or an apparent groin swelling were reassessed by one of the authors (BD).ResultsThere were 214 men and 5 women. Patients ranged from 18 to 87 years of age (mean 54 years). Seventy two percent of postal questionnaires were returned. Following telephone calls the overall response rate was 80%. The mean follow up period was 60 months (range: 9 – 132 months). Immediate complications were similar in both groups. The recurrence rates were 1.1% for Lichtenstein repair and 6.3% for Kugel patch (p= 0.09). None of the patients in the Lichtenstein group and 1.6% of patients in Kugel patch group complained of severe chronic pain in inguinal region.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the immediate complication rates between the two groups. Although recurrence and chronic groin pain rates are higher with Kugel repair, this was not statistically significant.